John W. from Pittsburgh, PA on 1/24/2022 5:04:13 PM:
Having done both trails, I’ve always felt the Erie Canal is behind the GAP/C&O in its development as a recreational trail. As the OP mentioned, there a quite a few roads one will need to traverse. Some of that is because parts of the canal are lost to time. The signage and mile markers are severely lacking in many parts. Perhaps this will improve with it now being marketed as the Empire State Trail. No one really knows where the Erie Canal towpath starts and begins, there’s no signage in Buffalo or Albany to tell you and there’s no mile markers either.
Getting information related to camping sites is hit or miss (“can I camp here or not?” comes up a lot on that forum), which makes planning difficult. There should be a concerted effort to create known camp sites along the trail for passing cyclists to use. They don’t have to be at the locks but rather use some of the more rural parts of the trail so only hiker/bikers can get to them. There’s one trail map online that is nice but it’s for the “Cycle the Erie Canal” event, an organized trip which diverts off the trail for nightly camping for 600+, but it’s not a downloadable map. A printable map is much better when no cell service is available.
The GAP/C&O has an organized set of maps online that are 99.9% updated and printable. Trail Towns are all on board and market themselves to touring cyclists eager for their business. Mile markers the entire length and good signage.
All that said I love the Erie Canal. Lovely scenery, good riding surface, history, and abundant towns and services. If whoever manages the trail would implement some of the above small changes, it would/could rival the GAP/C&O as a week long cycling destination.